You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
最新活动
大模型
产品
解决方案
定价
生态与合作
支持与服务
开发者
了解我们

讨论类型及其操作时使用术语“over”的意义及相关疑问

Understanding the Term "over" in Type Operations

Great question! Let’s unpack this term clearly, since it’s a common point of confusion when dealing with algebraic structures like monoids.

Where does "over" come from?

Absolutely—this term has its roots in mathematics, specifically abstract algebra. In fields like group theory or set theory, we talk about operations "over a set" to mean the operation takes elements from that set as inputs and produces an element within the same set. For example, addition is an operation over the set of integers: you take two integers, add them, and get another integer.

When this terminology moved into type theory and programming, it carried the same core meaning. So when we say a monoid has an associative binary operation "over" its type, we’re directly borrowing that algebraic language.

What does it mean for the operation?

Your intuition here is spot-on! When we say an operation acts "over" a type, it means:

  • The operation’s inputs are instances of that exact type (no external data from other types required)
  • The output is also an instance of that same type

Let’s use concrete examples to make this tangible:

  • For the monoid of integers under addition: the + operation acts over Int—you pass two Ints, get an Int back, no external values needed.
  • For the monoid of strings under concatenation: the ++ operation acts over String—two strings go in, one string comes out, no extra data from outside the String type is involved.

This is a key property of algebraic structures like monoids, semigroups, or groups: their operations are closed over their underlying type/set.

内容的提问来源于stack exchange,提问作者harry callahan

火山引擎 最新活动