Python实现的FFD棒材切割算法中部分零件缺失问题排查与修复请求
Python实现的FFD棒材切割算法中部分零件缺失问题排查与修复请求
问题描述
我最近用Python写了一个基于**First Fit Decreasing(FFD)**的棒材切割优化工具,目标是把订单里的各种零件都分配到6000mm长的标准棒材中,最后生成可视化的切割报告。但现在遇到了一个头疼的问题:有些订单里的零件(比如XC9)明明在输入里有对应的数量,但是最终的切割计划里完全找不到它们的影子,用计数器核对数量时也显示这些零件根本没被分配进去。
我已经做的排查
- 确认所有需要切割的零件都完整出现在初始的输入订单列表里,没有遗漏
- 跟踪了代码里的分配循环流程,发现这些缺失的零件似乎根本没被添加到任何棒材中
- 用计数器对比请求数量和实际分配数量,确实存在明显的不匹配
我的实现代码
注:原始输入最后一行的订单条目是截断状态,我暂时标注了注释,默认是笔误导致的不完整条目
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*- import pandas as pd from collections import Counter def optimize_cuts(stock_length, required_pieces): """ Calculates the bar cutting plan using the First Fit Decreasing algorithm. """ # 1. Create a complete list of individual pieces pieces_list = [] for item in required_pieces: for _ in range(item['quantity']): pieces_list.append({ 'name': item['name'], 'length': item['length'] }) # 2. Sort pieces from largest to smallest pieces_list.sort(key=lambda x: x['length'], reverse=True) used_bars = [] # 3. Allocate each piece for piece in pieces_list: allocated = False # Try to fit the piece in an existing bar for bar in used_bars: used_length = sum(p['length'] for p in bar) if stock_length - used_length >= piece['length']: bar.append(piece) allocated = True break # If it doesn't fit in any existing bar, create a new one if not allocated: used_bars.append([piece]) return used_bars def generate_tabular_report(stock_length, cutting_plan): """ Formats the cutting plan result into a table (DataFrame) using pandas. """ print("=" * 80) print(" BAR CUTTING OPTIMIZATION PLAN (TABULAR)") print("=" * 80) table_data = [] for i, bar in enumerate(cutting_plan, 1): piece_counter = Counter(p['name'] for p in bar) lengths = {p['name']: p['length'] for p in bar} row_data = {'SEQUENCE': f'CUT {i}'} piece_idx = 1 for name, qty in piece_counter.items(): row_data[f'NAME_{piece_idx}'] = name row_data[f'QTY_{piece_idx}'] = qty row_data[f'LENGTH_{piece_idx}'] = lengths[name] piece_idx += 1 total_used = sum(p['length'] for p in bar) leftover = stock_length - total_used row_data['TOTAL USED'] = total_used row_data['LEFTOVER'] = leftover table_data.append(row_data) if not table_data: print("No pieces to process.") return df = pd.DataFrame(table_data) max_pieces = (len(df.columns) - 3) // 3 ordered_columns = ['SEQUENCE'] for i in range(1, max_pieces + 1): ordered_columns.extend([f'NAME_{i}', f'QTY_{i}', f'LENGTH_{i}']) ordered_columns.extend(['TOTAL USED', 'LEFTOVER']) for col in ordered_columns: if col not in df.columns: df[col] = '' df = df[ordered_columns] df.fillna('', inplace=True) print(df.to_string(index=False)) total_bars = len(cutting_plan) total_leftover = df['LEFTOVER'].astype(float).sum() overall_utilization = ((total_bars * stock_length - total_leftover) / (total_bars * stock_length)) * 100 print("\n" + "=" * 80) print(" SUMMARY") print("=" * 80) print(f"Total {stock_length}mm bars needed: {total_bars}") print(f"Overall material utilization: {overall_utilization:.2f}%") print("=" * 80) def verify_quantities(order_list, final_plan): """ Checks if the quantity of pieces in the final plan matches the initial order. """ requested = {item['name']: item['quantity'] for item in order_list} allocated_pieces = [] for bar in final_plan: for piece in bar: allocated_pieces.append(piece['name']) allocated = Counter(allocated_pieces) print("\n" + "=" * 80) print(" QUANTITY VERIFICATION") print("=" * 80) if dict(allocated) == requested: print("✅ SUCCESS: All requested quantities were correctly allocated in the plan!") else: print("❌ WARNING: There is a mismatch between the order and the final plan.") for name, qty_requested in requested.items(): qty_allocated = allocated.get(name, 0) if qty_requested != qty_allocated: print(f" - Piece '{name}': Requested={qty_requested}, Allocated={qty_allocated}") print("=" * 80) # --- INPUT DATA --- if __name__ == "__main__": STOCK_BAR_LENGTH = 6000 order_list = [ {'name': '396', 'quantity': 290, 'length': 6000}, {'name': 'XC21', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 4478}, {'name': 'XC52', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 4308}, {'name': 'XC19', 'quantity': 2, 'length': 4240}, {'name': 'XC22', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 3759}, {'name': 'XC48', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 3698}, {'name': 'XC20', 'quantity': 20, 'length': 3514}, {'name': 'XC10', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 3452}, {'name': 'XC51', 'quantity': 4, 'length': 3382}, {'name': 'XC41', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 3256}, {'name': 'XC15', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 3239}, {'name': 'XC8', 'quantity': 16, 'length': 3076}, {'name': 'XC9', 'quantity': 2, 'length': 2732}, {'name': 'XC1', 'quantity': 1, 'length': 2693}, {'name': 'XC13', 'quantity': 2, 'length': 2631}, # 注:原始输入此处截断,应为一个完整的订单条目,比如 {'name': 'XXX', 'quantity': N, 'length': L} ] cutting_plan = optimize_cuts(STOCK_BAR_LENGTH, order_list) generate_tabular_report(STOCK_BAR_LENGTH, cutting_plan) verify_quantities(order_list, cutting_plan)
我自己的可疑点(不确定)
我注意到输入里有个396的零件,长度刚好是6000mm(和标准棒材一样长),数量还高达290个。会不会是这部分零件的处理逻辑影响了后面的分配?不过代码里是把所有零件展开成单个条目再排序的,理论上不应该影响其他零件的分配啊...
求助需求
麻烦帮我看看代码里哪里的逻辑出了问题,导致部分零件没被正确分配?有没有什么修改方案能让所有输入的零件都被包含到最终的切割计划里?




