n维物理能否适配n±1维空间？3D物理可在2D空间生效吗？

Let’s break down your questions one by one—they get at some really foundational, fascinating ideas in theoretical physics:

1. Can an n-dimensional physical system function in n-1 or n+1 dimensional space? #

n+1 dimensional space #

• For most cases, an n-dimensional system can be embedded into an n+1-dimensional space without breaking its original rules—as long as the extra dimension doesn’t introduce new physical interactions. Think of it like playing a 2D board game on a table in a 3D room: the game’s rules don’t change just because there’s a third dimension above and below the table, since nothing interacts with the pieces along that axis.
• If the extra dimension has active physical effects (like the tiny compactified dimensions in string theory), the original n-dimensional laws will get modified or stop applying entirely. The extra dimension adds new degrees of freedom and interactions that the original system wasn’t designed to account for.

n-1 dimensional space #

• Trying to directly "crush" an n-dimensional system into n-1 dimensions almost always breaks its core laws. For example, 3D angular momentum is a 3-component vector, but in 2D it reduces to a single scalar—this destroys the rotational symmetry that underpins 3D mechanics, so the original rules can’t hold as-is.
• The big exception is holographic duality (like AdS/CFT), where the full information of an n-dimensional system is encoded in an (n-1)-dimensional boundary theory. But this isn’t the n-dimensional system "working" in lower dimensions—it’s a mathematical equivalence between two distinct theories, not a direct translation of the same system into fewer dimensions.

2. Can 3D physical laws exist in 2D space? #

Directly copying 3D laws: No #

Space dimensionality is baked into the very structure of physical laws. For example:

• Coulomb’s law in 3D follows an inverse-square ($1/r^2$) relationship, but in 2D it’s inverse-linear ($1/r$)—a direct consequence of Gauss’s theorem, which depends entirely on the number of spatial dimensions. You can’t force 2D electromagnetism to behave exactly like 3D electromagnetism without breaking fundamental mathematical consistency.
• Symmetries also shift dramatically: 3D has full rotational symmetry around any axis, while 2D only has rotational symmetry around a single point (perpendicular to the plane). This alters everything from particle interactions to conservation laws.

AdS/CFT duality: Equivalence, not identical laws #

The 3D AdS/CFT correspondence means a 3D gravitational theory is mathematically equivalent to a 2D conformal field theory (CFT). But the 2D CFT has its own unique rules—it doesn’t "use" 3D laws directly; instead, every phenomenon in the 3D AdS space has a corresponding, translated phenomenon in the 2D CFT.

Can we modify the encoding to get identical or completely different laws? #

• Identical laws: Extremely unlikely. Dimensionality is a fundamental parameter that shapes the degrees of freedom, interaction strengths, and symmetry groups of a theory. Even with holography, the low-dimensional theory’s structure is tied to the high-dimensional space’s geometry—you can’t make a 2D theory behave exactly like a 3D one without ignoring core constraints of dimensionality.
• Completely different laws: Absolutely. Holographic dualities aren’t unique—different high-dimensional spacetime backgrounds correspond to different 2D CFTs with distinct rules. Beyond that, we can construct entirely artificial 2D systems (like many condensed matter setups, e.g., quantum Hall effect systems) whose laws have no connection to 3D gravitational physics at all—they’re independent, low-dimensional physical frameworks.

内容的提问来源于stack exchange，提问作者user181226