关于Hidden Markov Models讲义Slide7中P(Dry|High)=0.3是否为笔误的咨询
Is P(Dry|High) = 0.3 a Typo in the HMM Lecture Notes?
Great question—let’s break this down using the context from the HMM lecture materials you’re referencing:
- First, check the probability normalization: If the notes also list
P(Rainy|High) = 0.7, then these two values sum to 1, which satisfies the basic axiom of probability for mutually exclusive, exhaustive observations. Mathematically, this is consistent on its own. - Now, consider the real-world intuition: High atmospheric pressure is strongly associated with dry, clear weather, while low pressure correlates with rainy conditions. If the notes frame "Dry" and "Rainy" as standard weather observations, then
P(Dry|High) = 0.3runs counter to this intuition. This makes it highly likely that this is a typo, and the intended values should be swapped:P(Dry|High) = 0.7andP(Rainy|High) = 0.3. - A less likely edge case: It’s possible the lecture uses a non-standard definition for the "Dry" observation (e.g., referring to high humidity instead of low), but this would be an unusual framing without explicit clarification.
To confirm, cross-reference with the state-observation diagram on page 6: if the diagram visually links High pressure to Dry conditions, that would further support that the 0.3 value is a typo.
内容的提问来源于stack exchange,提问作者Juan
相关产品推荐
相关产品推荐

