移动端版本性能优于AMP，AMP展示量下降技术问询

After wrapping up our mobile optimization project and verifying our site meets AMP compliance standards, we noticed a steady drop in AMP page impressions. To diagnose the issue, we ran performance tests across multiple articles and gathered the following key data:

• Standard page response time: 12 ms
• AMP page response time: 16 ms

  Insight: AMP pages load slower than our standard mobile pages

• Google AMP Cache response time: 20 ms

  Insight: Pages served from the Google AMP Cache are even slower than direct AMP pages

• Response time ratio (Standard / AMP): 0.75x

  This means our standard mobile pages load 25% faster than our AMP pages

The core problem here is clear: despite checking all the boxes for AMP compliance, our AMP pages (including cached versions) are underperforming in load speed compared to our optimized standard mobile pages. This speed gap is almost certainly driving the decline in AMP impressions—users won’t stick around for slower pages, and search engine algorithms may prioritize our faster standard pages over AMP alternatives in results.

内容的提问来源于stack exchange，提问作者Hernán1