You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
优惠活动
大模型
产品
解决方案
定价
更多

MySQL与MSSQL INSERT速度对比测试及MySQL插入性能优化方案

MySQL批量INSERT操作性能优化实测

测试环境为Windows 10,测试场景为循环执行10000次完全相同的插入操作,初始测试MySQL与MSSQL的性能对比如下:

初始性能测试结果

MySQL执行情况

执行命令:
CALL TestStoredProcedure(10000);
执行结果:

/* Affected rows: 0 Found rows: 1 Warnings: 0 Duration for 1 query: 48.906 sec. */

MSSQL执行情况

执行命令:
EXEC TestStoredProcedure @iterations = 10000;
执行结果:

/* Affected rows: 10,000 Found rows: 0 Warnings: 0 Duration for 1 query: 0.875 sec. */

测试用存储过程代码

MySQL存储过程

BEGIN
    DECLARE counter INT DEFAULT 1;

    WHILE counter <= iterations DO
        INSERT INTO mytable (COLUMN1, COLUMN2) VALUES (counter, 'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA');
        SET counter = counter + 1;
    END WHILE;
END

MSSQL存储过程

BEGIN
    DECLARE @counter int
    SET @counter = 1

    WHILE (@counter <= @iterations)
        BEGIN
            INSERT INTO mytable (COLUMN1, COLUMN2) VALUES (@counter, 'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA')
            SET @counter = @counter + 1
        END
END

优化方案及实测结果

经排查验证,核心优化方案为在MySQL执行插入操作前添加START TRANSACTION;语句手动开启事务,优化后各存储引擎的实测耗时如下:

  • InnoDB(开启手动事务):0.406 sec
  • InnoDB(默认配置):48.312 sec
  • MyISAM:23.218 sec
  • MEMORY:22.922 sec
  • BLACKHOLE:22.890 sec
  • ARCHIVE:22.860 sec

内容的提问来源于stack exchange,提问作者MightyMouse

相关产品推荐
方舟 Agent Plan

超全模态模型 × Harness 升级,最新支持 Deepseek-V4.1-Flash、GLM-5.3 系列、Doubao-Seedream-5.0-pro、Kimi-K3 (部分), 限时 9.9 元起

最近更新时间:2026.09.27 12:36:02