基于SSD MobileDet与TensorFlow 1.15.5的分类损失优化问询
SSDLite MobileDet自定义模型训练优化问题
我使用TensorFlow 1.15.5,基于Google Coral的SSDLite MobileDet教程,用约20000张标注图像从零训练自定义模型。
我的配置基于官方示例,并做了以下修改:
- 类别数:11
- 批次大小:64
- 基础学习率:0.2
- 根据训练集自定义宽高比
使用这些参数,我得到了相当不错的结果:




我尝试进一步优化结果,降低呈轻微上升趋势的分类损失。
通常针对损失上升的建议是降低学习率,因此我首先调整学习率如下:
cosine_decay_learning_rate { learning_rate_base: 0.12 # 此前为0.2 total_steps: 400000 warmup_learning_rate: 0.01333 # 此前为0.1333 warmup_steps: 281 # ~1轮训练,此前为2000 }
这使得mAP、AR和总损失有所改善,但分类损失在约120000步后开始急剧上升:
因此我尝试进一步降低学习率,以期解决该问题:
cosine_decay_learning_rate { learning_rate_base: 0.03 total_steps: 400000 warmup_learning_rate: 0.00333 warmup_steps: 281 # 1轮训练 }
结果mAP、AR下降,且分类损失(橙色曲线)更高:
这让我认为或许只需将总步数减少至200000,让学习率下降更快,而非初始值更低:
cosine_decay_learning_rate { learning_rate_base: 0.12 total_steps: 200000 warmup_learning_rate: 0.01333 warmup_steps: 281 # 1轮训练 }
结果mAP、AR与之前相近,但出乎意料的是,随着学习率下降加快,分类损失上升得更快:

进一步降低总步数会加速分类损失的上升,我不确定下一步该尝试什么。
以下是我的完整pipeline.config:
model { ssd { num_classes: 11 image_resizer { fixed_shape_resizer { height: 320 width: 320 } } feature_extractor { type: "ssd_mobiledet_edgetpu" depth_multiplier: 1.0 min_depth: 16 conv_hyperparams { regularizer { l2_regularizer { weight: 4e-05 } } initializer { truncated_normal_initializer { mean: 0.0 stddev: 0.03 } } activation: RELU_6 batch_norm { decay: 0.97 center: true scale: true epsilon: 0.001 train: true } } use_depthwise: true override_base_feature_extractor_hyperparams: false } box_coder { faster_rcnn_box_coder { y_scale: 10.0 x_scale: 10.0 height_scale: 5.0 width_scale: 5.0 } } matcher { argmax_matcher { matched_threshold: 0.5 unmatched_threshold: 0.5 ignore_thresholds: false negatives_lower_than_unmatched: true force_match_for_each_row: true use_matmul_gather: true } } similarity_calculator { iou_similarity { } } box_predictor { convolutional_box_predictor { conv_hyperparams { regularizer { l2_regularizer { weight: 4e-05 } } initializer { random_normal_initializer { mean: 0.0 stddev: 0.03 } } activation: RELU_6 batch_norm { decay: 0.97 center: true scale: true epsilon: 0.001 train: true } } min_depth: 0 max_depth: 0 num_layers_before_predictor: 0 use_dropout: false dropout_keep_probability: 0.8 kernel_size: 3 box_code_size: 4 apply_sigmoid_to_scores: false class_prediction_bias_init: -4.6 use_depthwise: true } } anchor_generator { ssd_anchor_generator { num_layers: 6 min_scale: 0.0625 max_scale: 0.95 aspect_ratios: 0.44 aspect_ratios: 0.85 aspect_ratios: 1.5 aspect_ratios: 2.41 } } post_processing { batch_non_max_suppression { score_threshold: 1e-08 iou_threshold: 0.6 max_detections_per_class: 100 max_total_detections: 100 use_static_shapes: true } score_converter: SIGMOID } normalize_loss_by_num_matches: true loss { localization_loss { weighted_smooth_l1 { delta: 1.0 } } classification_loss { weighted_sigmoid_focal { gamma: 2.0 alpha: 0.75 } } classification_weight: 1.0 localization_weight: 1.0 } encode_background_as_zeros: true normalize_loc_loss_by_codesize: true inplace_batchnorm_update: true freeze_batchnorm: false } } train_config { batch_size: 64 data_augmentation_options { random_horizontal_flip { } } data_augmentation_options { ssd_random_crop_fixed_aspect_ratio { } } sync_replicas: true optimizer { momentum_optimizer { learning_rate { cosine_decay_learning_rate { learning_rate_base: 0.12 total_steps: 400000 warmup_learning_rate: 0.01333 warmup_steps: 281 # 1 epoch } } momentum_optimizer_value: 0.9 } use_moving_average: false } num_steps: 400000 startup_delay_steps: 0.0 replicas_to_aggregate: 32 max_number_of_boxes: 100 unpad_groundtruth_tensors: false } train_input_reader { label_map_path: "/lab/labelmap.pbtxt" tf_record_input_reader { input_path: "/lab/data/train.records" } } eval_config { num_examples: 8000 metrics_set: "coco_detection_metrics" use_moving_averages: false } eval_input_reader { label_map_path: "/lab/labelmap.pbtxt" shuffle: false num_epochs: 1 tf_record_input_reader { input_path: "/lab/data/val.records" } } graph_rewriter { quantization { delay: 0 weight_bits: 8 activation_bits: 8 } }
内容的提问来源于stack exchange,提问作者Blake B
相关产品推荐
相关产品推荐

