Snowflake中VALIDATION_MODE='RETURN_ERRORS'未正确验证文件的问题咨询
VALIDATION_MODE='RETURN_ERRORS' catching header row type errors in Snowflake COPY INTO? My Scenario
I tried using Snowflake's COPY INTO command with VALIDATION_MODE='RETURN_ERRORS' to validate a CSV data file, but didn't get the error I expected. Here's the command I ran:
copy into users from @%users/user_account.txt.gz file_format=(type = 'CSV') validation_mode='RETURN_ERRORS';
The first two lines of my CSV file look like this:
id,name,emailid,signupdate 1,user1,user1@gmail.com,13/10/2021
Since the first line is a text-based header, and I didn't specify SKIP_HEADER or DATE_FORMAT in the file format options, I expected the command to throw a data type mismatch error (the header's id string can't map to a numeric column in my users table). Instead, the command succeeded and returned 0 error records.
When I switched to VALIDATION_MODE='RETURN_1_ROWS' with this command:
copy into users from @%users/user_account.txt.gz file_format=(type = 'CSV') validation_mode='RETURN_1_ROWS';
I did get a data type error for the header row. This makes me wonder—did I use the first RETURN_ERRORS command incorrectly?
The Root Cause: Different Behavior Between Validation Modes
Snowflake handles these two validation modes with distinct logic, which explains the discrepancy:
RETURN_1_ROWS: This mode forces Snowflake to parse and validate the very first row of the file, regardless of whether it looks like a header. Since your first row is text-based (and doesn't match your table's column types), it throws the expected error.RETURN_ERRORS: This mode focuses on validating rows that Snowflake identifies as actual data. A key detail here is that Snowflake has automatic header detection logic: if the first row's values match your target table's column names (and subsequent rows have matching data types), it will automatically skip the header row without you specifyingSKIP_HEADER=1.
In your case, Snowflake recognized the first line as a header and skipped it, only validating the second row of actual data. If that second row is compatible with your table's schema (e.g., 13/10/2021 can be implicitly converted to a date using your session's default date format, or signupdate is a VARCHAR column), there are no errors to return—hence the 0 error records.
How to Verify This
To confirm this behavior, try modifying your command to force Snowflake to treat all rows as data:
copy into users from @%users/user_account.txt.gz file_format=(type = 'CSV', SKIP_HEADER=0) validation_mode='RETURN_ERRORS';
By setting SKIP_HEADER=0, you disable automatic header detection. Snowflake will now validate the header row as data, and you should see the data type mismatch error you initially expected.
Summary
You didn't misuse the RETURN_ERRORS command—its behavior is just different from RETURN_1_ROWS:
RETURN_1_ROWSreturns results for the first row, no matter its content.RETURN_ERRORSskips rows it identifies as headers and only reports errors in actual data rows.
If you want to catch header-related errors with RETURN_ERRORS, explicitly disable automatic header detection using SKIP_HEADER=0.
内容的提问来源于stack exchange,提问作者Pawan Rawat

