如何在PineScript中管理多离场条件？实操问题求助

需求 #

希望在满足以下特定条件时平仓：

1. TP1 - 价格达到计算出的百分比（示例设为5%，实际为动态值）时平仓对应比例仓位
2. TP2 - 逻辑同TP1，阈值为10%时平仓剩余对应比例仓位
3. SL - 价格下跌至特定百分比以下时全部平仓
4. 止损移至盈亏平衡点（BE） - 当盈利达到特定阈值（如3%）时，将止损位调整至入场价

问题现状 #

尝试使用strategy.exit()、strategy.close()及其组合实现，但始终存在条件互相抵消或失效的问题，逻辑处理混乱。

CASE1：仅使用strategy.close() #

表现：TP1和SL正常触发，但TP2从未生效。
代码：

// TP1 and SL BE
if (tp1_cond and not tp1_taken) //and not tp1_taken)
    strategy.close(tradeId, qty_percent = tp1perc, comment="TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    //strategy.exit("TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty_percent = tp1perc) // one exit order somehow cancels another, despite different IDs
    //strategy.exit("SL BE "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, qty_percent = 100-tp1perc, stop=entryPrice) // TODO: Figure out why this is decreasing strategy performance - smth to do with one order canceling another I guess
    array.set(tp1_taken_arr, tp1_index, true)

// TP2
if (tp2_cond and not tp2_taken)
    strategy.close(tradeId, qty_percent = tp2perc, comment="TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    //strategy.exit("TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty_percent = tp2perc)
    array.set(tp2_taken_arr, tp2_index, true)
    
// Stop-loss condition
if (stopLossCond)
    strategy.close(tradeId, comment="SL: "+str.tostring(tradeId), immediately = true)
    //strategy.exit("SL", from_entry = tradeId, stop = entryPrice)

CASE2：仅使用strategy.exit() #

表现：仅条件4（移止损到BE）和条件3（SL）生效，TP1、TP2失效。
代码：

// TP1 and SL BE
if (tp1_cond and not tp1_taken) //and not tp1_taken)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, qty_percent = tp1perc, comment="TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    strategy.exit("TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty_percent = tp1perc) // one exit order somehow cancels another, despite different IDs
    //strategy.exit("SL BE "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, qty_percent = 100-tp1perc, stop=entryPrice) // TODO: Figure out why this is decreasing strategy performance - smth to do with one order canceling another I guess
    array.set(tp1_taken_arr, tp1_index, true)

// TP2
if (tp2_cond and not tp2_taken)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, qty_percent = tp2perc, comment="TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    strategy.exit("TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty_percent = tp2perc)
    array.set(tp2_taken_arr, tp2_index, true)
    
// Stop-loss condition
if (stopLossCond)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, comment="SL: "+str.tostring(tradeId), immediately = true)
    strategy.exit("SL", from_entry = tradeId, stop = entryPrice)
    
// Check if price has popped by the break-even threshold and move stop loss to break-even - increased peformance of the strategy and decreased the drawdown - if set specifically at 3%, needs some experimenting
if (currentProfit >= slBeThreshold)
    strategy.exit("POP - Move to BE: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, stop=entryPrice)

CASE3：注释条件4后使用strategy.exit() #

表现：TP1、TP2和SL均可正常生效，但缺少止损移至BE的功能。
代码：

// TP1 and SL BE
if (tp1_cond and not tp1_taken) //and not tp1_taken)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, qty_percent = tp1perc, comment="TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    strategy.exit("TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty_percent = tp1perc) // one exit order somehow cancels another, despite different IDs
    //strategy.exit("SL BE "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, qty_percent = 100-tp1perc, stop=entryPrice) // TODO: Figure out why this is decreasing strategy performance - smth to do with one order canceling another I guess
    array.set(tp1_taken_arr, tp1_index, true)

// TP2
if (tp2_cond and not tp2_taken)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, qty_percent = tp2perc, comment="TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    strategy.exit("TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty_percent = tp2perc)
    array.set(tp2_taken_arr, tp2_index, true)
    
// Stop-loss condition
if (stopLossCond)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, comment="SL: "+str.tostring(tradeId), immediately = true)
    strategy.exit("SL", from_entry = tradeId, stop = entryPrice)

EDIT1：当前最优组合（仍有局限） #

表现：能正常执行TP1、TP2和SL，但无法处理条件4（止损移至BE），也无法扩展更多平仓条件。
代码：

// TP1 and SL BE
if (tp1_cond and not tp1_taken) //and not tp1_taken)
    strategy.close(tradeId, qty = tradeQty * tp1perc/100, comment="TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    //strategy.exit("TP1: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,  qty = tradeQty * tp1perc) // one exit order somehow cancels another, despite different IDs
    //strategy.exit("SL BE "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, qty_percent = 100-tp1perc, stop=entryPrice) // TODO: Figure out why this is decreasing strategy performance - smth to do with one order canceling another I guess
    array.set(tp1_taken_arr, tp1_index, true)

// TP2
if (tp2_cond and not tp2_taken)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, qty = tradeQty * tp1perc/100, comment="TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId)) 
    strategy.exit("TP2: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry=tradeId, profit = 1,   qty = tradeQty * tp2perc/100)
    array.set(tp2_taken_arr, tp2_index, true)
    
// Stop-loss condition
if (stopLossCond)
    //strategy.close(tradeId, comment="SL: "+str.tostring(tradeId), immediately = true)
    strategy.exit("SL: "+str.tostring(tradeId), from_entry = tradeId, stop = entryPrice)

内容的提问来源于stack exchange，提问作者Ondrej Tokar